Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1864 (AP)

Smt. Vadlapalli Parimala v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/1381/2025 · 2026-05-05

Subhendu Samanta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010021512025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 1381/2025 Between: 1. SMT. VADLAPALLI PARIMALA, W/O. VADLAPALLI VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. H.NO. 24-6-336, KRANTI NAGAR, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE TOWN, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA. AADHAAR CARD NO. 7937 7754 4677 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, AT NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BALAJI NAGAR POLICE STATION, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT, AT ONGOLE. ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in 2 the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not enquiring whereabouts of petitioner's husband Vadlapalli Vijay Kumar and not informing the same to me as illegal, arbitration and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to enquire whereabouts of petitioner's husband and informed the same to me forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents herein to enquire about the whereabouts of petitioner's husband Sri Vadlapalli Vijay Kumar and inform the same to me, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA RAGHU MANNEPALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 1381 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the purpose of the Writ Petition does not survive, so the Writ Petition may be disposed of. 2. Taking note of submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:06.05.2026. sj 4 47 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 1381 of 2025 Dated:06.05.2026. sj