HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6929 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Amrendra Nath Tripathi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 5 on the basis of instructions received by him. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no dispute with regard to the fact that presently dispute between the parties pertains to the land bearing Khata No. 229 Gata No. 920ka, area 17 biswa 15 dhur, Gata No. 922 kha, area 1 bigha 17 biswa and Gata No. 923 ga, situated in Village - Majha Barehat, Pargana - Haveli Awash, Tehsil - Sadar, District - Ayodhya, with regard to the same Revision No. 5785 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. D 202504230005785) - Chotelal Vs. Ram Lautan and Another is pending consideration before the District Magistrate, Ayodhya. 3. Grievance raised by the petitioner is that his application for interim relief has not been considered by the District Magistrate till date despite the fact that the defendants in the said matter have put in appearance. 4. Accordingly, it is stated that grievance of petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case revisional Court is directed to consider and decide petitioner's application for interim relief with expedition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Abhinav Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aviral Chandra, Shailendra Kumar Tripathi, Sudheer Sharma Chotelal Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the above prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the District Magistrate, Ayodhya to consider and decide application for interim relief filed in Revision No. 5785 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. D 202504230005785) - Chotelal Vs. Ram Lautan and Another, expeditiously, say within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, after giving full opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. 7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to press application for grant of ad- interim injunction in case grounds are so made out. The parties have undertaken to cooperate in the proceedings before the District Magistrate and objections, if any, by the defendants shall be filed within next two weeks. December 3, 2025 A. Verma A227 No. 6929 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench