HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11646 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Upon perusal of the documents, it appears that there is a private dispute between the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 & 6, who are the private parties. 3. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of without passing any order. 4. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum/court/authority in accordance with law for redressal of his grievances. December 9, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajeev Prakash Saxena, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Shatarupa Runda .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench