DHARAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY./ ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
A227/6676/2025 · 2025-11-15
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6676 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Ravi Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vikas Rai, the learned State Counsel.
2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned State Public Service Tribunal, Indira Bhawan, Lucknow for expeditious disposal of Claim Petition No. 930 of 2025, Dharam Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors, under Section 4 of the U.P. Public Service Tribunal Act, which was filed by the petitioner against three opposite parties: (1) State of U.P., (2) Inspector General of Police, Meerut Range, Meerut, and (3) Senior Superintendent of Police, District Bulandshahr.
3. Upon the Court's query as to why all the opposite parties to the petition having not been impleaded in this petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner could not give any reply.
4. As non joinder of all the parties remains unexplained by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed due to non joinder of necessary parties.
November 15, 2025 Pradeep/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Dharam Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./ Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench