RANJIT KUMAR BARUAH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS
WP(C)/6363/2018 · 2025-08-10
Arun Dev Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18636 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18636 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010196652018
2025:GAU-AS:10552
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6363/2018 RANJIT KUMAR BARUAH S/O- LATE BHUPATI BHUSAN, R/O- CHIRING CHAPORI, UNIVERSITY LINK ROAD, P.O- DIBRUGARH, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN- 786001 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPTT, DISPUR, GHY- 781006 2:ALLAHABAD BANK DIBRUGARH BRANCH REP. BY THE CHIEF MANAGER DIBRUGARH- 786001 ASSAM 3:PRASENJIT BARUAH S/O- LATE BHUPATI BHUSAN R/O- CHIRING CHAPORI UNIVERSITY LINK ROAD P.O- DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM- 786001 4:RAKTIM JYOTI BARUAH S/O- PRANABJYOTI BARUAH CHIRING CHAPORI UNIVERSITY LINK ROAD P.O- DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786001
Page No.# 2/3 5:PRANAB JYOTI BARUAH S/O- LATE DHRUVA BHUSAN BARUAH LEELA GOGOI PATH MILAN NAGAR (EAST) C R BUILDING DIBRUGARH- 786003 6:RUPJYOTI BARUAH S/O- LATE DHRUVA BHUSAN BARUAH CHIRING CHAPORI UNIVERSITY LINK ROAD P.O- DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786001 7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH DISTRICT DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786001 8:SANJIB BARUAH S/O- LATE BHUPATI BHUSAN R/O- CHIRING CHAPORI UNIVERSITY LINK ROAD P.O- DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786001 9:CHIRANJIB BARUAH S/O- LATE BHUPATI BHUSAN R/O- CHIRING CHAPORI UNIVERSITY LINK ROAD P.O- DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 78600 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A C BORBORA, MRS. R BORBORA,MR. M NATH,MR. M SMITH,MR. N SAIKIA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, MR. K N CHOUDHURY (R4, R5),MS. R DEKA (R4, R5),MR. M MAHANTA (R4, R5),MR. D J DAS (R4, R5)
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 11.08.2025
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and therefore, the petitioner would not like to press this writ petition. Accordingly the writ petition stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant