JAGDAMBA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. P.W.D. LKO. U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/13959/2025 · 2025-12-03
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13959 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of 'Mandamus' thereby commanding the opposite parties to sanction and grant pensionary benefits to petitioner in view of judgment and order dated 02.09.2019 passed in case of Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others as well as order dated 04.11.2025 passed by this Hon'ble High Court."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. State of U.P. through its Additional Chief Secretary, Public Works Department, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow, U.P., - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same, in light of the aforesaid judgments, in case same are applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 3, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Jagdamba Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. P.W.D. Lko. U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench