Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18634 (KAR)

SRI JAGADEESH S POOJARI v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/5843/2025 · 2025-03-17

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10872 WP No. 5843 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 5843 OF 2025 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: SRI. JAGADEESH S. POOJARI, S/O SEENAPPA POOJARI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT BALYA MANE, BARIMARU GRAMA, KAAGEKANE POST, BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 253. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUYOG HERELE E., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANGALURU, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT, CHAMARAJAPETE, BENGALURU - 560 004. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT, MANGALURU, D.K DISTRICT - 575 004. 4. SMT. TULASI SHETTY, W/O NAVITH SHETTY, AGE NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10872 WP No. 5843 of 2025 R/AT MIRA BAGH, ALAITHI MAR, KAGEKANE POST, BARIMARU GRAMA, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K DISTRICT - 576 121. 5. SRI. K. PRAJWAL KAMATH, S/O K PRASANNA KAMATH, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER R/AT KADEKANA MANE, BARIMARU GRAMA, MANI POST, BANTWAL TALUK D.K DISTRICT - 576 121. 6. SRI. RATNAKAR POOJARY, S/O LINGAPPA POOJARI AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER R/AT KALLETTI MANE, BARIMARU GRAMA, KAGEKANE POST, BANTWAL, D.K DISTRICT - 576 121. 7. SRI. DAYANAND, S/O LOKAYYA, AGE NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER R/AT SHERAMANE, BARIMARU GRAMA, BUDOLI POST, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K DISTRICT - 576 121. 8. SRI. P. SUBRAMANYA BHAT, S/O NARASIMHA BHAT, AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/AT NO. 2-197 B, PACCHADI BAILU MANE, PERLAPU POST, KADESHIVALAYA GRAMA, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K DISTRICT - 576 121. 9. SRI. KANALTAYA DAIVASTHANA, BARIMARU, BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 576 121, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10872 WP No. 5843 of 2025 REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRATHIBHA R.K, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-3 DATED 07.02.2025 IN NO. TRS.CR.65/2024-25, WHEREIN APPOINTING THE R-4 TO 8 AS MEMBERS TO MANAGING COMMITTEE OF R-9 TEMPLE AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO (PRODUCED AT ANNX-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri. Suyog Herele E., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. Prathibha R.K., learned AGA appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and have perused the material on record. 2. The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following prayers: "i. Issue a Writ in the nature of Certiorari and quash the Order passed by the Respondent No.3 dated 07-02-2025 in No. TRS.CR 65/2024-25, wherein appointing the Respondent No.4 to 8 as members - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:10872 WP No. 5843 of 2025 to Managing Committee of Respondent No.9 temple and all further proceedings pursuant thereto (produced at Annexure-A). ii. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus and direct the Respondent No.1 to 3 to reconstitute afresh managing committee to Sri. Kanaltaya Daivasthana, Barimaru, Bantwal Taluk, Dakshina Kannada district/Respondent No.9 by considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 05-11- 2024 (produced at Annexure-C1 to C2). iii. issue any other Writ or Order and grant such other and further relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity." 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a petition before the Rajya Dharmika Parishath questioning the very action and in that light, they would seek to withdraw the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at this juncture, submits that a direction be issued to the respondent - Rajya Dharmika Parishath to dispose the petition within a timeframe. 5. The request merits acceptance, as the prayer is innocuous. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:10872 WP No. 5843 of 2025 6. The Rajya Dharmika Parishath shall dispose the petition within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46 CT: BHK