HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6781 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner prays for and is permitted to implead Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Lalganj, District Pratapgarh as party. 3. Let necessary impleadment be made during course of the day. 4. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 5. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Judicial) Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh to decide Case No. 1695 of 2024, Computerized Case No. T202402570201695 (Harkesh Bahadur Singh Vs. Ramesh Bahaadur Singh and others) U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Judicial) Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 7. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neetu Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Harkesh Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) into the merits, Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Judicial) Tehsil Lalganj, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide Case No. 1695 of 2024, Computerized Case No. T202402570201695 (Harkesh Bahadur Singh Vs. Ramesh Bahaadur Singh and others) U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 9. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 10. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 20, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6781 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench