AWADH KISHORE SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SINCHAI AND JAL SANSADHAN DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14956/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14956 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3, Shri Nishant Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, whose vakalatnama filed today is taken on record. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"(i) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party No. 2 to pay the interest on the delayed payment of leave encashment of the petitioner at the rate of 9% per annum from the due date till the date of actual payment. (ii)to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 10.12.2025 contained as Annexure No. 10 to the writ petition within stipulated time. (iii) to issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the circumstances of the case; and (iv) to allow this petition with costs in favour of the petitioner."
3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ends of justice would sub-serve if, this Court directs the respondent Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shesh Ram Mishra, Lalit Narayan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jogendra Nath Verma Awadh Kishore Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sinchai And Jal Sansadhan Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
no.2 to consider and decide representation dated 10.12.2025 moved by the petitioner, within the time fixed by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off directed the respondent no.2- Chairman and Administrator, Sharda Sahayak Command, 23-C, Gokhale Marg, Lucknow to consider and dispose of the representation dated 10.12.2025 moved by the petitioner, by a speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith.
December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14956 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench