HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11337 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0157/2011, under sections - 376, 506 IPC, Police Station - Patti, District - Pratapgarh. 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the co-accused were enlarged on bail vide orders which are on record, however, in the case of applicant a final report was filed. Subsequently, on protest petition the applicant was summoned, however, he could not appear as he was out of town. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail and the applicant undertakes to co-operate with the trial, he is enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant Sunil Kanojia alias Sunil Rajak be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 20, 2025 mks Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhupendra Prakash, Manish Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Shailesh Kumar Baranwal Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Sunil Kanojia @ Sunil Rajak .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench