UDAI RAJ v. SRI VISHESHWAR PRASAD, CHIEF ENGINEER U.P. JAL NIGAM RANA PRATAP MARG LKO.
/3418/2025 · 2025-12-04
Manish Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186325 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186325 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3418 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Respondent has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the judgment and order passed by Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, if any, is hereby discharged. December 4, 2025 Ashish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anamika Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Udai Raj .....Applicant(s) Sri Visheshwar Prasad, Chief Engineer U.P. Jal Nigam Rana Pratap Marg Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench