Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186323 (ALL)

SAYYAD RIYAZ HAIDAR v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO. THRU. MEMBER AND OTHERS

/7099/2025 · 2025-12-09

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7099 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Pankaj Gupta is present for respondent No.2. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to respondent No. 1-Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide Revision No.1627 of 2018 (District Shrawasti) (Wakar Mehndi and others Vs. Sayyad Riyaz Haider @ Parvez and others), expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Revision No.1627 of 2018 (District Shrawasti) (Wakar Mehndi and others Vs. Sayyad Riyaz Haider @ Parvez and others), expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Srivastava, Kamal Nayanam Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Sayyad Riyaz Haidar .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Member And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench