Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18632 (AP)

GUDALA NAGARAJU v. GUDALA CHOLA LAKSHMI PADMAVATRHI DEVI

CMA/979/2007 · 2025-02-04

Challa Gunaranjan, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010258392007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 979/2007 Between: Gudala Nagaraju Gudala Chola Lakshmi Padmavatrhi Devi Counsel for the Appellant: 1. . Counsel for the Respondent: 1. CH DHANAMJAYA The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 979/2007 ...APPELLANT AND Gudala Chola Lakshmi Padmavatrhi Devi ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: Counsel for the Respondent: following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3509] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CHALLA GUNARANJAN ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 979/2007 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) This appeal was filed by the husband being aggrieved from dismissal of his petition for divorce. 2. Notice was issued to the appellant in view of the death of his counsel. 3. As per the office report notice is returned unserved and as per the postal endorsement there was insufficient address ‘for want of door number’. 4. A perusal of the notice sent with the registered acknowledgment shows that the same was sent to the address as was mentioned in the appeal filed by the appellant. 5. There is no representation on either side. 6. The matter pertains to year 2007 and is listed in the weekly cause-list. 7. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is closed. However, granting liberty to the appellant to file the recall petition of this order, if so desired, within a reasonable period. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _______________________ CHALLA GUNARANJAN,J Dated: 04.02.2025 AG 87 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 979/2007 Dated:04.02.2025 AG