HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1154 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner alleges encroachment by opposite party nos.7 to 9 over Khadanja Marg and Nala, situated in Mohalla- Naya Purwa, Tehsil- Sadar, P.S.- Cantt., District- Ayodhya. He approached the Nagar Nigam, however, it was informed that the land/property in question is nazool land. When he approached the Nazool Section of the Nagar Nigam, they informed that in fact it is not nazool land, but falls in revenue village. 3. However, learned Standing Counsel says that there is no encroachment. According to the learned Standing Counsel, the land over which the Khadanja Marg and Nala are situated is non-ZA land, which is recorded in the relevant khewat and there is no such Khadanja Marg or Nala in the revenue map. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner will have to seek appropriate remedy under Section 152 of B.N.S., 2023 or if permissible under Sections 25/26/67 of 2023 or such other remedy as may be prescribed. We cannot enter into such disputed questions of fact. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of. November 15, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Sewak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ripu Daman Shahi (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Guljari Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench