Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186318 (ALL)

RANJEET BHARTI (S.I. , PNO-152710024) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/15201/2025 · 2025-12-19

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15201 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. Although petition has been filed challenging order of minor punishment dated 02.02.2022 but learned counsel for petitioner submits that against the aforesaid order, a representation under Rule 25 of the U.P. Police Officers of the Subordinate Rank (Punishment and Appeal) Rules 1991 has been preferred and is still pending consideration. 3. At present learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for a final decision with regard to same. 4. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, opposite party No.1 i.e. Principal Secretary, Home Department, U.P. Civil Secretariat, Lucknow is directed to consider and decide representation dated 27.01.2023 in case the same is maintainable within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before said authority. Petitioner shall annex a copy of representation dated 27.01.2023 alongwith certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Chandra, Lalit Kishor Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ranjeet Bharti (S.I. , Pno-152710024) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench