PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. LABOUR DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/15012/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186317 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186317 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15012 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:-
"(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to correctly fix the salary of the petitioner from the date of his initial appointment at the rate of Rs.4590/- per month in place of 4510/-."
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before concerned authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Pratap Singh, Devang Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Labour Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench