ARVIND KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9638/2025 · 2025-11-15
Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186315 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186315 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9638 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
1. Heard Sri Mulayam Singh Yadav, holding brief of Sri Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed to quash the charge-sheet dated 17.08.2003 arising out of Case Crime No. 1130 of 2003, under Sections 392, 411 IPC., Police Station Kotwali Unnao, District Unnao and the order dated 03.09.2025 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Unnao, in Criminal Case No. 1399 of 2022 State of U.P. Vs. Rajesh Chaurasiya by which non-bailable warrant dated 03.09.2025, has been issued. 3. After arguments on merits at length learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the prayers made in the present petition on merits. He submitted that vide order dated 03.09.2025 non bailable warrant has been issued against the applicant. He further submits that the purpose of the applicant would be served if he is permitted to appear before the trial court within a period of two weeks from today and file a regular bail application/an application for recall of non-bailable warrants. 4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection on aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi, Sunil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arvind Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that if the accused-applicant appear and apply for bail/an application for recall of non-bailable warrants before the court concerned within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. 6. For a period of two weeks from today or till appearance of the applicant, whichever is earlier, the non-bailable warrants be kept in abeyance. However, if the applicant does not appear in the aforesaid time, the court concerned shall proceed as per law. 7. The present application is disposed of.
November 15, 2025 NSC A482 No. 9638 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench