Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1863 (HP)

VIJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/16475/2025 · 2026-04-24

Ajay Mohan Goel

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15917, 16475 and 19381 of 2025 Decided on: 24.04.2026 1. CWP No.15917 of 2025 Rajneesh Kumar & ors. … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and ors. … Respondents 2. CWP No.16475 of 2025 Vijay Kumar & ors. … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and ors. … Respondents 3. CWP No.19381 of 2025 Kapil Dev … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and anr … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate and Mr. Piyush Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) As common issues of law and facts are involved in these petitions, they were taken up for consideration together. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the reliefs prayed for by the petitioners in these petitions are squarely covered by judgment dated 22.09.2025, passed by Hon’ble Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.5267 of 2023, titled as Uttam Ram & others Versus State of H.P. & others and interest of justice would be served in case these petitions are disposed of by ordering that the directions passed by Hon’ble Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.5267 of 2023 (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply to the present petitions also. 3. Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of by ordering that the directions passed by Hon’ble Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.5267 of 2023 (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply to these petitions also and respondents are directed to regularize the service of the petitioners as per the existing policy alongwith all consequential benefits including seniority. This order is subject to the right of the respondents to assail the same if so advised. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 24, 2026 (mamta)