SMT. REETA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
/9563/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186290 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186290 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9563 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the matter is being finally decided.
3. The instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to lodge the F.I.R. on the basis of representation dated 07.08.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition.
4. The contention is that despite the petitioner having approached the respondent No.2 by means of her application dated 07.08.2025, no action has been taken by him in this regard till date.
5. Learned A.G.A. states that an endeavour would be made to decide the said representation in accordance with law within the specified time.
6. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the pending application of the petitioner dated 07.08.2025 expeditiously in accordance with law. November 20, 2025 S. Shivhare Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Sharma, Aakanksha Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Smt. Reeta Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench