HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14960 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2-4. 2. Notice to respondent no.4 is hereby dispensed with. 3. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "1. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly opposite party no. 2 to grant pension to petitioner in accordance with Uttar Pradesh State Aided- Educational Institution Employee's Contributory Provident Fund Insurance Pension Rules from the date of resignation i.e. 01.10.1986 together with arrears, with interest @6 percent per annum (the true copy of representation is contained in ANNEXURE- 1 to the writ petition). 2. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly opposite party no. 2 for payment of gratuity to petitioner along with interest @12 percent per annum in accordance with Rules for Grant of Gratuity to the teachers of Aided Educational Institutions read with Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 (the true copy of representation is contained in ANNEXURE- 1 to the writ petition). Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saksham Agarwal, Amar Mani Tiwari, Anupriya Agarwal, Rakesh Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Awadh Narain Dixit .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondry Education, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 3. To allow the cost of petition in favour of petitioner. 4. The court may pass any order as may deem fit, in the interest of Equity, Justice and Good Conscience." 4. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ends of justice would sub-serve if, this Court allows the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 and he may be directed direct to consider and decide the same, within the time fixed by this Court. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation before the respondent no.2- Director, Secondary Education, UP, Lucknow ventilating her grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her enclosing therewith the copy of her earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 15 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith. December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14960 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench