Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186275 (ALL)

AMAN GARG v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO.

/12126/2025 · 2025-12-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12126 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Shwetabh Singh, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 284 of 2025, under sections 105, 288 BNS, Sections 9B, Explosive Substance Act, P.S. Risiya, District Bahraich. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on 20.10.2025 son of the informant had gone to shop of applicant for purchasing firecrackers and while coming from shop the bag in which he was carrying firecrackers fell which resulted in explosion and substantial injuries was caused to son of the informant because of which he died. Considering the nature of allegations prima facie offence under Section 105 is not made out. 4. Learned counsel for the informant has no objection to grant of bail. 5. Considering the nature of allegations, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 22.10.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Aman Garg be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aman Garg .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 4, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12126 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench