Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186258 (MAD)

Mariammal v. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

WP Crl.(MD)/1971/2025 · 2025-11-05

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1971 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P.Crl.(MD).No.1971 of 2025 N.Mariyammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, Kallimandhaiyam Police Station, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. 3. Muthuraj, 4. Murugan, 5. Perumal, 6. Aandavan, 7. Ayyammal, 8. Saraswathi, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1971 of 2025 praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner to fence the land by considering my representation dated 06.10.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.Arun Kumar For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide police protection for fencing the land, by considering her representation dated 06.10.2025. 2.Admittedly, there is a dispute between the petitioner and her neighbors, who are arrayed as respondents 3 to 8, as regards the boundaries of the land. It is a case of the petitioner that survey was conducted and the boundaries were marked. Therefore, the respondents 3 to 8 have no right to prevent the petitioner from fencing the property. 3.The respondent police have no jurisdiction to entertain such a dispute and provide police protection as prayed for. If it is the case of the petitioner 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1971 of 2025 that the respondents 3 to 8 are illegally preventing her from fencing the property, it is needless to say that the appropriate remedy would be to approach the civil Court. 4.With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 05.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No CP To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kallimandhaiyam Police Station, Ottanchathiram Taluk, Dindigul District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1971 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. CP W.P.Crl.(MD).No.1971 of 2025 05.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis