HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1150 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri Girish Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing for respondents no. 1 and 2. 2. In light of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is with regard to the order dated 29.9.2925 passed by the Settlement Officer, Consolidation, wherein he has allowed the appeal preferred by the private respondents. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the appellate proceedings the petitioner was not made a party but the Settlement Officer, Consolidation has considered the objections preferred by the petitioner. The petitioner before this Court has denied to file such objections. 5. It is on the aforesaid grounds, it is stated that the appellate order dated 29.9.2025 is to be set aside. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of filing a revision before the Deputy Director of Consolidation against the impugned order where he raised all the objections regarding Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Pandey, Chandra Chood Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Radhey Shyam @ Rady Syam .....Petitioner(s) Settlement Officer Of Consolidation, Distt. Ayodhya And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) the validity in the order dated 29.9.2025. 7. Considering the rival contentions, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner has an efficacious statutory remedy under Section 48 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act of filing a revision. It is the petitioner can raise all the grounds assailing the order dated 29.9.2025 and the revisional authority would have full authority to consider the said issues after summoning the record. 8. In light of the above that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. 9. Accordingly, the petitioner is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. December 5, 2025 Muk WRIB No. 1150 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench