RAVI PRATAP CHAURASIA v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P., LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS
/7096/2025 · 2025-12-09
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186251 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186251 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7096 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent while Sri Pankaj Gupta has accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.3.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to respondent No.1 - Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide Second Appeal No.2225/2023, District Deoria, Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs. Ravi Pratap and others, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide Second Appeal No.2225/2023, District Deoria, "Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs. Ravi Pratap and others", expeditiously, say within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.)
Ravi Pratap Chaurasia .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lko. Thru. Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench