[2025:RJ-JP:25086] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6261/2025 1. Aditya @ Susu S/o Shri Dayaram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Jajor Bas, Police Station Sadar Alwar, District Alwar. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). 2. Gaurav @ Chiyan S/o Shri Jaswant Singh, R/o Jajor Bas, Police Station Sadar Alwar, District Alwar. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/07/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0418/2024 registered at Police Station-Sadar Alwar, District-Alwar for the offence under Section 103(1) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the entire prosecution case is based on circumstantial evidence, as there is no eye-witness exists of the incident. He further submits that though there is recovery of one PVC Pipe at the instance of the present petitioners but on the same ground prime accused-Bhunveshwar @ Bhunni has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 28.03.2025. [2025:RJ-JP:25086] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6261/2025] There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. He again submits that the petitioner-Aditya @ Susu is behind the Bar since 28.04.2024 and the petitioner-Gaurav @ Chiyan is behind the Bars since 29.04.2025 respectively and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that the prime accused has already been enlarged on bail, therefore for maintaining the parity but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-(1)Aditya @ Susu S/o Shri Dayaram and (2) Gaurav @ Chiyan S/o Shri Jaswant Singh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/81