Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18625 (AP)

Amjalapu Kanthamma v. Muramalla Manikyam

CRP/2176/2014 · 2025-07-21

Harinath N

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010258472014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2176/2014 Between: 1. AMJALAPU KANTHAMMA, W/O LATE RAMA KRISHNA, R/O A. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, THONDANGI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MURAMALLA MANIKYAM, W/O SAMBA MURTHY, SATRAMPADU VILLAGE, ELURU MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. 2. CHUKKALA VARAHALU, W/O LATE VEGESWARA RAO, OPP: RAMALAYAM, R/O A. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, THONDANGI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. CHUKKA AMMAJI, W/O LATE PAPA RAO, OPP: RAMALAYAM, R/O A. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, THONDANGI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. GIDUTURI MANGAYYA, S/O NOOKARAJU, RAMAKRISHNA COLONY, H/O S.ANNAVARAM, TUNI MANDAL, E.G.DIST. 5. PASAGADUGULA VARAHALAMMA, W/O NOOKARAJU, MARKUNDRAJUPETA VIA GULLIPADU 6. DONEPUDI SEETHAMMA, W/O NAGARAJU, C/O VARRE APPA RAO, PATHA PATTISEEMA. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toUnder Section 115 being aggrieved by the order, dated 23/6/2014 passed in EP.No.102 of 2012 in O.S.No.269 of 2004 on the file of the court of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tuni. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRPMP 3037 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to order dated 23/6/2014 passed in EP.No.102 of 2012 in O.S.No.269 of 2004 on the file of the court of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tuni, East Godavari District, pending disposal of the main CRP and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P RAJASEKHAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2176 of 2014 ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Revision Petition does not survive as the main E.P. was dismissed. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt: 22.07.2025 sj 4 118 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2176 of 2014 Dt: 22.07.2025 sj