Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186246 (ALL)

ABDUL HASEEB AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/10935/2025 · 2025-12-03

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10935 of 2025 Court No. - 22 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Shiv Ram Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Neel Padam Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Present petition has been filed for the following relief: "a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 27.08.2025 passed by opp. party no.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration)-Ist, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda in Case No.1314/2025, Computerized Case No.C-202508000001314, Ganga Ram V/s Abdul Haseeb and others, under section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition) in the interest of justice." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that against the order dated 28.06.2025, the respondent no.5 has filed an appeal u/s 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (in short 'the Code, 2006') which is not maintainable as appeal has been filed on the grounds which are non-existent. 4. Per contra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has submitted that against the order passed u/s 24 of the Code, 2006, any affected party can file appeal u/s 207 of the Code, 2006. 5. Considering the aforesaid submission and on perusal of record, it appears that the appeal against the order dated 28.06.2025 passed u/s 24 of the Code, 2006 has been filed within 30 days i.e. on 04.07.2025 and by order dated 27.08.2025, appeal has been admitted for hearing. Therefore, there is no illegality in the impugned order admitting the appeal against the order passed u/s 24 of the Code, 2006. However, the petitioners can raise all grounds available to them during the hearing of the appeal. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Ram Tewari, Mukesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Abdul Haseeb And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 6. In view of the above, this court does not find any illegality in the order dated 27.08.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Administration)-Ist, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda. 7. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. December 3, 2025 S.C. WRIC No. 10935 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench