Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186229 (ALL)

ARADHANA GUPTA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.andORS.

WRIA/6342/2016 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6342 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, counsel for respondent no. 3 are present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 20, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, Neeraj Chaurasiya (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Aradhana Gupta And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench