Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186226 (ALL)

SUMAN GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/13297/2025 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13297 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider the case of petitioner for promotion on the post of Personal Assistant Grade - II with effect from the date of her junior, Mr. Sunil Kumar was granted such benefit on 25.01.2018. 3. It is submitted that earlier petitioner was visited with minor penalty which however stands expunged but the aforesaid benefit has not been granted. 4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Additional Director General, Technical Services, Headquarter, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 20, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Suman Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench