Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186225 (ALL)

NANHKE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR, UNNAO AND OTHERS

/11796/2025 · 2025-12-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11796 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Standing counsel for the State - respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.3 has been accepted by Sri Dileep Kumar Pandey. 1. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent is dispense with. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for a direction to respondent No.2 - Sub Divisional Officer, Hasanganj, District Unnao to decide the stay application filed in suit for division of land, expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2 - Sub Divisional Officer, Hasanganj, District Unnao is directed to decide application for interim relief preferred by the petitioner in suit for division of land within a period of six weeks after service of notice on the respondents in accordance with law and in case the application for interim relief cannot be decided, it shall be open for the petitioner to press ad-interim relief which the appellate authority shall consider and decide, in accordance with law. 5. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 6. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Nanhke .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Unnao And Others .....Respondent(s) With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. December 4, 2025 RKM. WRIC No. 11796 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench