GYANVATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. P.W.D. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/9434/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186218 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186218 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9434 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. It has been submitted that inadvertently incorrect prayers have been made in the petition due to which afresh filing is required.
3. In view of such submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh. December 19, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Gupta, Sachin Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Gyanvati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. P.W.D. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench