Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186212 (ALL)

BANSH BAHADUR VERMA v. ANANDESHWAR PRASAD

A227/7001/2025 · 2025-12-03

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7001 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Bajrang Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Room No.15, Sultanpur to decide the suit for mandatory injunction bearing No.35/2023 (Bansh Bahadur Vs. Anandeshwar) under Section 39 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed the aforesaid suit for mandatory injunction on 07.01.2023. On 18.12.2024, the trial court passed an order holding service of summon on the defendant to be sufficient but the defendant did not put in appearance before the trial court and the trial court has not even proceeded with the suit ex-parte. 4. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of with the direction to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Room No.15, Sultanpur to decide the suit for mandatory injunction bearing No.35/2023 (Bansh Bahadur Vs. Anandeshwar) under Section 39 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 expeditiously, in accordance with law, without giving any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. December 3, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shubham Singh, Bajrang Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Bansh Bahadur Verma .....Petitioner(s) Anandeshwar Prasad .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench