Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18620 (RAJ)

MANSINGH S/O RAMESHWAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6269/2025 · 2025-06-13

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23205] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6269/2025 Mansingh S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Selu, Police Station Surwal, District Sawai Madhopur Raj. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Teeka Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 13/06/2025 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.221/2018 registered with the Police Station Surwal, District Sawai Madhopur for offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 382, 307 if IPC and Sections 27 & 28 of Arms Act. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar so also perused the material made available on record. 4. The accused-petitioner was extended the benefit of bail, however, during trial he could not appear before the learned trial Court and, therefore, his bail bonds were forfeited and arrest warrant was issued. The accused-petitioner was again arrested on 26.04.2025 and since then he is in custody. [2025:RJ-JP:23205] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6269/2025] 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, so also the fact that initially the accused- petitioner was extended the benefit of bail and because he could not appear on a particular date before the learned trial Court, his bail bonds were forfeited and now he is in custody since 26.04.2025 and other accused are also on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J ARTI SHARMA /146