HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11466 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. C.M.Application No. Nil of 2025 (Application for Correction) 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant stated that he may be permitted to correct the name of the applicant in the memo of bail application. 2. To the aforesaid prayer, there is no objection. 3. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to make necessary correction in the memo of bail during course of the day. Order on Bail 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking bail in FIR No. RC0062025A-0023 under Section 61(2) BNS 7, 7A, 8 & 12 P.C. Act, P.S.-CBI, ACB, Lucknow. 3. While pressing the instant application, learned counsel for the applicant stated that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. 4. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that co-accused Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjai Srivastava, Anchit Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anurag Kumar Singh Suneel Jayasval @ Suneel Kumar Jayasval .....Applicant(s) Central Bureau Of Investigation/Anti Corruption Bureau Lko. Thru. Superintendent .....Opposite Party(s) namely Aadrsh Yogi and Santosh Kumar Jaiswal, having identical role, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10635 of 2025 and Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10053 of 2025, respectively. 5. It is lastly submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from judicial custody or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, they shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. It is submitted that considering aforesaid, the applicant, who is in jail since 27.08.2025 is entitled to be released on bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial and would also not influence the prosecution witnesses. In these circumstances of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer of the applicant. However, he could not dispute the fact that co-accused namely Aadrsh Yogi and Santosh Kumar Jaiswal, having identical role, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. 8. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and going through the contents of the application, F.I.R., as well as other relevant documents and also that co-accused having identical role have already been enlarged on bail by this Court, this Court is of the view that the application has substance and it is accordingly, allowed. 9. Let the applicant-Sunil Kumar Jaiswal @ Sunil Jaiswal be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions :- (i) The applicant will cooperate with the prosecution during trial. (ii) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during trial. (iii) The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness(es). (iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence. (v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer BAIL No. 11466 of 2025 2 or tamper with the evidence. (vi) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through counsel. (vii) The applicant will not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. (viii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. 10. In case of default of above conditions it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. 11. As this order relates to enlargement of the applicant on bail, it is clarified that observations made in this order shall have no bearing on the merits of the case and the trial court shall not be influenced by any observation made in this order. November 20, 2025 Vinay/- BAIL No. 11466 of 2025 3 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench