Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010196482025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/963/2025 RHITURAJ NEOG S/O RAJENDRA PRASAD NEOG, R/O HOUSE NO.1, LAVANYAPRIYA GROUND FLOOR, NEAR MAA DURGA MANDIR, , CHANDAN NAGAR, SURVEY, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI-781028, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M P CHOUDHURY, MR. S BATHARI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Bail Appln./2330/2018 RHITURAJ NEOG S/O SH. RAJENDRA PRASAD NEOG R/O HOUSE NO.1 BYE LANE NO. 2 CHANDAN NAGAR SURVEY BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781006 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR B CHOUDHURY Advocate for : MR P P BARUAH(P.P. ASSAM) appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 19.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. M.P. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.P. Dutta, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State respondent. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sri Rhituraj Neog, who is praying for modification of condition imposed while granting bail to the petitioner vide order dated 11-10-2018 passed in Bail Application No.2330/2018. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is regularly appearing before the Trial Court and has been cooperating in the trial after getting bail in Special Case No.2/2017 pending before the Court of learned Special Judge, Assam. 4. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, that as the parents of the present petitioner are ailing and suffering from serious ailment Page No.# 3/3 like Thyroid ailment as well as lung ailment, he has to accompany his parents outside Assam frequently, and sometimes on emergency basis and under such circumstances it becomes difficult to take prior permission from the Court before leaving the jurisdiction of the Trial Court and therefore, he submits that the condition (b) and (e) attached to the bail order dated-11.10.2018 passed in Bail Appln. 2330/2018 by a Coordinate Bench of this Court may be modified. 5. On the other hand, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is regularly appearing before the Trial Court. 6. I have considered these submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides. 7. Considering the reasons shown for seeking a modification of condition (b) and (e) attached to the aforesaid bail order as well as considering the fact that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions of the bail and is cooperating in the trial, this Court is of considered opinion that under which the petitioner is seeking modification of the aforesaid bail order, the said condition seems to be onerous for the petitioner in case of medical emergency of his parents. 8. Accordingly, the aforesaid condition that is condition (b) as well as condition (e) attached to the aforesaid bail order shall be regarded as deleted and the aforesaid bail order is treated to be modified accordingly. 9. This interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant