SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGH (CONSTABLE , PNO-892310339) AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/14875/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186142 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186142 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14875 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs:-
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to count the petitioners' training period as qualifying service for grant of service benefits in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant one additional increment on completion of 19 years of service by including the training period of the petitioners, strictly according with law in the interest of justice."
3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file individual fresh representations before the authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shravan Kumar Singh (Constable , Pno-892310339) And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench