Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18614 (AP)

P. Ramesh, v. Sri Mallikharjuna Swamy Kamakshi Thai Temple,

WP/32997/2012 · 2025-07-24

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010257632012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 32997 of 2012 Between: 1. P. RAMESH,, S/O SRI SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RIO JONNAWADA VILLAGE, BUTCHIREDDYPALEM MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT - 524 320. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI MALLIKHARJUNA SWAMY KAMAKSHI THAI TEMPLE, JONNAWADA VILLAGE, BUTCHIREDDYPALEM MANDAL, NELLORE DIST., REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, DHARMIKA BHAVAN, BOGGULAKUNTA, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, MZ-II, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. SRI G DANIEL BABU ASST COMMISSIONER, EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SRI LAKSHMI PADMAVATHI SAMETHA SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, VYKUNTAPURAM, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 in not applying his own mind in accordance with rules and Sec.37 of the Endowments Act, 1987, while passing the impugned Order Memo.in Rc.No.7/2006-8, dated: 25.01.2012 as had, illegal, violative of principles of natural justice and hit by Sec.37 of the Endowments Act, 1987, besides hit by post-decisional hearing and consequently set aside the Memo.in Rc.No.7/2006-8, dated: 25.01.2012. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V T M PRASAD 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri K.Srinivas, learned counsel representing Sri D.V.Sasidhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the present Writ Petition is rendered infructuous and the same is also endorsed on the bundle. In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.07.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.32997 of 2012 Date: 25.07.2025 siva