Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18613 (RAJ)

DUSHYANT SINGH S/O SHRI DINESH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5810/2024 · 2025-02-11

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6216] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5810/2024 Dushyant Singh S/o Shri Dinesh Singh, R/o Dabadwas, Tehsil Neemrana, District Kotputali Bahror (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.S. Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/02/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in FIR No.88/2024 registered at Police Station Shahjahanpur, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences under Sections 143, 341, 323 & 379 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that only bailable offence is 379 IPC and dispute has been resolved amicably by the parties. In this regard, a written compromise has also been placed on record. It is submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and his custodial interrogation is not required in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. Despite name of counsel being shown in [2025:RJ-JP:6216] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5810/2024] the cause list, none has put in appearance on behalf of the victim/complainant to oppose this bail application. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the petitioner and as also the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedents, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the pre- arrest bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Shahjahanpur, District Kotputli-Behror in FIR No. 88/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner - Dushyant Singh S/o Shri Dinesh Singh, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to their satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /224