Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186114 (ALL)

KULDEEP KUMAR @ KULDEEP KASHYAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/11665/2025 · 2025-12-03

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11665 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. None has appeared for the informant despite notice. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.689 of 2025, under sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), BNS, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, Section 3(2)(5) SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali Sadar, District Kheri. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of informant aged about 16 years was enticed by the applicant. The said version was not supported by the victim in her statement under Section 180 BNSS wherein she stated that she was in love with the applicant. The tentative age of the victim is around 17 years. The victim refused to undergo medial examination. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the age of the victim and refusal to undergo medial examination, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 29.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Kuldeep Kumar @ Kuldeep Kashyap be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalji Prasad Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kuldeep Kumar @ Kuldeep Kashyap .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 3, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11665 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench