APHC010037962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 2112/2025 Between: 1. M.RAHAMTHULLU, S/O M.KHAJH HUSSAIAN, AGED ABOUT62 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O 4-99,MOLAGAVALLI VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. M.MUNTHAZ,, W/O M.RAHAMTHULLU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,OCCU HOUSE WIFE, R/O 4-99,MOLAGAVALLI VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. M.YOUSUF, S/O M.RAHAMTHULLU, AGED ABOUT 29, YEARS, OCCU EMPLOYEE, R/O 4-99,MOLAGAVALLI VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT BUILDINGS , VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE, ALUR POLICE STATION, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. BHUPESH, S/O PERVILAIAH, AGED NOT KNOWN R/O MOLGAVALLI VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. GRAKA HUSSAIN SAHEB, S/O KASIM SAHEB, R/O MOLGAVALLI 2 VILLAGE, ALUR MANDAL, KUMOOL DISTRICT. 6. RAHIMAN BASHA, S/O CHANDA BASH, R/O HOSA ASHRYA COLONY, BALLERY, KARNATAKA STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandmus declaring the action of the 3 rd respondent in calling the petitioners to the Police station and harassing the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3 respondent not to calling the petitioners to the Police Station and harass the petitioners IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to calling the petitioners to the police station and harass pending disposal of the main W.P. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B S VENKATA RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 2112/2025 ORDER: It is specifically submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, since this Court passed the interim order dated 29.01.2025. The police authority has not called the petitioner to the police station. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home has placed on record the written instructions of the Station House Officer, contending inter alia that the petitioner was called in pursuant to a specific complaint made by unofficial respondent. However, it is stated that the matter is purely civil in nature and has since been settled before the village elders. 3. Taking note of the written instructions furnished by the concerned respondent authorities. 4. With the above observations, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:07.05.2026. SSA