ZAINAB FATIMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKOandORS.
WRIA/5721/2016 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186099 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186099 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5721 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 20, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shobhit Mohan Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Zainab Fatima And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lkoandors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench