Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186092 (ALL)

HASNU ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO.

BAIL/11711/2025 · 2025-12-05

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11711 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 379 of 2025, under sections 87, 64(1) BNSS, P.S. Ramgaon, District Bahraich. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the informant was called by the applicant on telephone to come to Punjab on the ground that he would marry her and when the victim was going on an auto she was apprehended by her uncle and brought back to her home. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim stated that physical relation were also formed on more than four occasions on false pretext of marriage. The tentative age of the victim is around 18 years. She also stated that she had gone to Jalandhar however the applicant did not meet her. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the age of the victim and the fact that relationship lasted over a substantially long period of time, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 23.10.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Hasnu Ali be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hasnu Ali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 5, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11711 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench