Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186087 (ALL)

SMT. ARTI SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.SECONDARY EDU.CIVIL SECTT.andORS.

WRIA/6269/2016 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6269 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 20, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Arti Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Secondary Edu.Civil Sectt.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench