V IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12915 OF 2025 Between: S.Suresh, S/o Ayyaswamy, Aged about 64years R/o.D.No.8-15/1, Flat No.404, Nikki's Nikethan Occ: Business, Tiruchanoor Road, Padmavathi Puram Tirupati, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh-517504. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati Tirupati District, -517501. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati District, Tirupati-517501. 4. TheTahsildar, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati District-517501 . ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents not considering petitioner's representation dated 09-01-2025 is arbitrary, illegal, violation of principals of natural justice and violation of Articles 14, 19, 20, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09-01-2025 and delete the petitioner's land an extent Ac 2.00 cents in Sy.No. 176/2 at Chennayigunta Village, Tirupati Urban Mandal from prohibitory list under section 22-A by issuing pattadar passbook and title deed on petitioner's name. lA No: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 09-01-2025 & delete the petitioner’s land an extent Ac 2.00cents in Sy.No.176/2 at Chennayigunta Village, Tirupati Urban Mandal from prohibitory list under section 22-A by issuing pattadar passbook & title deed on petitioner’s name. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.V.V.S. VARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER 1 APHC010258272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3329] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12915/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER S Suresh AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.GVVS VARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12915/2025 The Court made the following Order: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief: “....Pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents not considering petitioners representation dated 09.01.2025 is arbitrary illegal violation of principals of natural justice and violation of Articles 14 19 20 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 09012025 and delete the petitioners land an extent Ac 2 OOcents in Sy No. 176/2 at Chennayigunta village, Tirupati Urban Mandal from prohibitory list under section 22-A by issuing pattadar passbook and title deed on petitioners name and pass or orders....” Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned 2. Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to 3. 3 issue a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 09.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for 4. Revenue for the respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner, if any, pending with the authorities, within a reasonable time. In view of the submission of the learned Government 5. Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. i„ wherein the Apex Court held that such orders P.Venkatesh may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the representation dated 09.01.2025, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 2004 (1) see 769 4 6. In the result, with the consent of both the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 09.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHAMMED RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati Tirupati District, -517501. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati District, Tirupati-517501. 4. TheTahsildar, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati District-517501 . 5. One CC to Sri G.V.V.S.Vara Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 7. Three CD Copies. [OUT] gi HIGH COURT DATED:08/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.12915of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS