Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186049 (ALL)

SMT. RAJPATA @ RAJ PATA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS

C372/108/2023 · 2025-10-29

Pramod Kumar Srivastava

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. - 108 of 2023 Court No. - 28 HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh as there are certain discrepancies in the appeal. To which there is no objection by the learned AGA. In view of above, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. October 29, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ved Prakash Shukla, Shiv Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) Smt. Rajpata @ Raj Pata Devi .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench