HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3968 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Heard. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging therein that the judgement and order dated 01.07.2025 passed in Matters under Article 227 No. 3770 of 2025 has not been complied with. The relevant part of the judgment and order dated 17.04.2025 is being reproduced hereinbelow:- "6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1 / Tehsildar, Tehsil - Aalapur, District Ambedkar Nagar is directed to decide Case No. 3626/2023, Computerized Case No. T202304040403626 (Janardan Vs. Rajdei)under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. " Learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the copy of the judgment and order of the Writ Court was served upon respondent on 14.07.2025 and from that three months period has already expired on 14.10.2025 but the same is still pending, hence, it amounts to wilful disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the Writ Petition and the respondent is liable to be punished under the provisions of Contempt of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akhilesh Tiwari, Renu Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Janardan .....Applicant(s) Sri Hub Lal, Naib Tehsildar Jahangirganj, Tehsil Alapur Dist. Ambedkar Nagar .....Opposite Party(s) Courts Act, 1971. From perusal of the order sheets enclosed collectively with the present contempt application as Annexure no. 3, it reveals that after service of the judgment and order of the Writ Court on 14.07.2025, the case was fixed on 7 dates, out of which on 5 dates, lawyers were abstaining from judicial work. So it cannot be said that the respondent is willfully or intentionally disobeying the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court. In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned hereinabove, no case of wilful disobedience of the judgment and order of the Writ Court is made out against the respondent. For the foregoing reasons, the present contempt petition is hereby dismissed. December 5, 2025 Ashish CAPL No. 3968 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench