NEERAJ @ NILESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1238/2025 · 2025-11-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1238 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in Complaint Case No.3777 of 2010, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station - Harpalpur, District - Hardoi. 3. The Counsel for the applicant argues that the complaint case was filed alleging that the daughter of the informant was married to the brother of the applicant. Subsequently, the entire matrimonial family had killed her. The father-in-law, the mother-in-law, the brother-in-law have been enlarged on bail vide orders on record. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 4. Learned AGA opposes the bail application. 5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in the order dated 30.10.2025 passed in ABAIL No. 1197 of 2025, ground of parity, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed. 6. Till the conclusion of trial, let the applicant Neeraj @ Nilesh be released Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Neeraj @ Nilesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each separately to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
November 10, 2025 Mohit Singh/- ABAIL No. 1238 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench