Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186022 (ALL)

DILEEP KUMAR AND 12 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/10857/2025 · 2025-11-12

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10857 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Ms. Shreya Prakash, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that due to certain defects that have crept in the petition she does not want to press the petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. Sri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Abhinit Jaiswal, the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as aforesaid. November 12, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shreya Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manoj Sahu (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Dileep Kumar And 12 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench