Sanapala M.M.M. Krishna, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/17005/2020 · 2025-09-14
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18602 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18602 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010257822020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No: 17005/2020 Between:
SANAPALA M.M.M. KRISHNA,, S/O. LATE SWETHA RAMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, R/O. D.NO. 39-16-54, FLAT NO. G2, BANGARAMMA RESIDENTCY, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER AND
1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN P.S. LAW AND ORDER, ALLIPURAM, BESIDE PREMA SAMAJAM, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. PALURI VENKATA KIRAN, S/O. LATE GUNNESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE AT HPCL, R/O. D.NO. 1-82-14, SECTOR - 3, M.V.P.COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondent No. 3 calling the Petitioner to their Police Station at the behest of Respondent No. 4 to settle the Civil Transaction between Petitioner and Respondent No. 4 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 21 of Constitution of India.”
2
2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not calling the Petitioner to the Police Station and are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties.
3. Sri T.D.Phani Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station, in the absence of any crime registered against the Petitioner. Police are further
directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.4. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.17005 of 2020
Dt.15.09.2025
Dinesh