RUMI DAYAL SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
/11600/2025 · 2025-12-09
Abdul Moin, Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186013 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186013 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11600 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents no.1, 2, 3, 5 and 6.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
4. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents filed along with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioner as per Rules of the Court after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. December 9, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Singh, Abhishek Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Rumi Dayal Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench